| |
CAW Threatens Strike at GM Oshawa Plant
28 Jan 08
Negotiations have not yet begun, but the war of words is already heating up between the Canadian Auto Workers union and General Motors.
Global Insight Perspective | | Significance | Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) union Local 222 has put General Motors "on notice" that if new product is not announced for the Oshawa (Ontario) assembly plant, that the company will face a strike when the contract is up on 17 September 2008. | Implications | CAW president Buzz Hargrove cites the C$2.5 billion that GM has in store for Oshawa investment as proof that the company is committed to building vehicles there in the future, but the economic, regulatory, and labour cost conditions have changed to the point where Canadian manufacturing has become too expensive. | Outlook | A strike is a very real possibility going into the third quarter negotiations, as the CAW has not yet felt the extraordinary contraction that the UAW has dealt with in advance of the ratification of their new contract late last year. But with the automakers currently holding major advantages in terms of capacity, cost, and strategy with regards to U.S. manufacturing, the CAW may be in for a big wake-up call. |
The Toronto Star reports that the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) union Local 222 has threatened to strike at General Motors (GM)'s Oshawa (Ontario) plant later this year if the company does not announce new product for the plant. The CAW's current contract is set to expire on 17 September 2008, and negotiations for a new contract are expected to begin in the third quarter. "Live up to the commitment given to us in the [2006] shelf agreement or you will not be getting a collective agreement this fall," the union warned in a leaflet distributed at the complex on Thursday (24 January). "The company promised us jobs when we did the shelf agreement and implemented the changes right away but [it has] yet to deliver on their commitment." GM has agreed to produce the new Chevrolet Camaro at the Oshawa plant in early 2009, but plans to also produce a rear-drive sedan at the plant have reportedly been shelved, leaving the plant without significant volume. "The employees are all up in arms about it. They're all worried about their jobs," said veteran GM worker Mike Plumpton, as quoted in the Star. CAW president Buzz Hargrove is confident that GM will continue to put some sort of volume in the plant, due to the financial commitments by the company, the provincial government, and the federal government. According to the union boss, GM is spending C$2.6 billion in Oshawa, including C$435 million pledged from the Ontario and federal governments. "We anticipated that [the Camaro] would be followed by other rear-wheel-drive vehicles, but the money they spent on the plant makes it a flex plant, so you can build both front-drive and rear-wheel-drive in the facility," said Hargrove in an interview with the Canadian Press. "I'm confident that [GM officials] not only want to build there, they're obligated to," he added. The investment is to consolidate the two existing facilities into one new facility, according to the company. But a GM official spoke to Automotive News last week, and sang a somewhat different tune. "Between the time we made the decision to make the investment in the flex plant and move forward with the new competitive offering agreement and Camaro, a huge amount has changed," said Stew Low, director of communications for GM of Canada. "The loonie [Canadian dollar] has soared to parity and beyond, and nobody anticipated a 35 mpg [CAFE] standard," Low toldthe trade publication. "The union is focused on new product programs and jobs—and guess what, so are we." Outlook and Implications Several factors have finally conspired to deal a serious blow to the Canadian auto industry, which in just a few short months has seen its cost and labour advantage over U.S. manufacturing all but evaporate. The recent agreement by the American United Auto Workers (UAW) union has taken the Canadian advantage of government-provided universal healthcare out of the equation, as the costs involved for the Detroit Three with regards to retiree healthcare are now set to be transferred in one lump sum to the UAW by 2010. Wages have also taken a big step away from the CAW contract, with the installation of a two-tier wage system at the UAW, which allows for workers at each of the Detroit Three to be hired in with total costs nearly one-third of legacy workers. The CAW has balked at the thought of a two-tier system, steadfastly refusing to discuss any such measure. The Canadian dollar achieved parity with the American dollar late last year, making imports of Canadian-manufactured goods more expensive. CAW contracts have been very good to CAW workers as well over the last 20 years, with vacation and wages that will make Canadian auto manufacturing actually more expensive than American manufacturing, once the new UAW contract is fully in effect. Unlike their cousins to the south however, the CAW has only recently begun to experience any kind of job or wage pressures, with the first rumblings of possible plant closures coming last year with Chrysler's Brampton (Ontario) facility. A fifth product, a new Chrysler Imperial luxury sedan, was scheduled to be built at the plant, but union refusal to grant concessions on a contract modification caused Chrysler to initially pull the project. Only after the company decided that it would not pursue manufacturing at Brampton did the union hold an emergency meeting and re-vote of the contract, passing the somewhat modified mid-cycle adjustment. The Imperial has since been cancelled due to corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) regulations anyway, which is what is also looking to affect the GM product portfolio as well. The final straw for the CAW may be the new CAFE regulations passed by the U.S. government, to be implemented by 2020. The new 35 mpg average fleet requirement is causing all of the Detroit Three to re-evaluate their product line-up; the rear-drive family of big sedans based on the Zeta platform shared by the Camaro may not proliferate much beyond the already announced models, according to GM insiders. The company reportedly told CAW representatives that the Impala slated for Oshawa, which was to have comprised nearly half of the total plant volume, would instead be made in the U.S. at a Michigan plant. Simply put, the CAW is in for an extremely difficult year in terms of contract negotiations. As much as the UAW faced serious challenges for their negotiations last year, the upcoming CAW negotiations look to be even more cut-throat and contentious. Unlike the UAW discussion last year, at issue now are basic wages and employment levels, as the CAW does not face cost pressures for healthcare that can be traded away in return for new product commitments. For the CAW, it comes down to making wage concessions and flexibility, two things that the union has steadfastly refused to discuss. The possibility of a strike is extremely real, but as with the UAW negotiations in 2007, the automakers are holding all the cards in this game. GM may have begun investing in a new Oshawa plant, but the cost of additional investment versus closures of U.S. capacity and the possibility of hiring in much lower wage UAW workers will in no way guarantee that GM will continue to fund Oshawa. GM's flexible production will allow it to make anything currently made at Oshawa at other plants, including the full-size pick-ups at the Oshawa truck plant. A strike at the Canadian manufacturing plants would likely boost production levels at UAW facilities. Chrysler and Ford would face more of a threat from a CAW strike, with both companies reliant on two Ontario plants for key models. Chrysler's Windsor (Ontario) minivan plant will be making critical product for Chrysler, but the Brampton plant's big sedans have seen lacklustre demand. Ford would be in an equally critical situation, with the Oakville (Ontario) plant producing the critical Edge and Flex crossovers. But all of the Detroit Three face extra capacity at their American plants, and a UAW that would likely be very receptive to additional product should worse come to worst, if it decides not to hold to solidarity with the CAW.
|
|
|